| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Chris Nelson
Posted via mailing list.
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:06 pm Post subject: Latest builds melt my CPU when trying to display navigator |
 |
|
I downloaded the latest nightly build of NB ruby support so I could run focused tests in shoulda. Unfortunately, whatever happens during the building of the ruby navigator outline view is so much slower that it makes NB unusable. My classes are pretty large but 6.5 is able to handle them much better. Any ideas why this would be?
--Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Erno Mononen
Posted via mailing list.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:58 am Post subject: Latest builds melt my CPU when trying to display navigator |
|
|
Hi Chris,
Chris Nelson wrote:
| Quote: | I downloaded the latest nightly build of NB ruby support so I could
run focused tests in shoulda. Unfortunately, whatever happens during
the building of the ruby navigator outline view is so much slower that
it makes NB unusable. My classes are pretty large but 6.5 is able to
handle them much better. Any ideas why this would be?
|
I think it's a side effect of the type inference improvements done in
7.0 dev. That stuff is still pretty fresh and hasn't yet been optimized
(nor thoroughly tested). I'll dig into this area in the coming weeks and
will look at this particular issue too. For the FCS we'll want
performance to be at least on par with 6.5.
Cheers,
Erno |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chris Nelson
Posted via mailing list.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:58 pm Post subject: Latest builds melt my CPU when trying to display navigator |
|
|
Makes sense. FWIW, it appears to do a whole a lot of work to build the navigation when you switch back to a class you've already visited, so it seems like there's at least some opportunity to do some caching.
--Chris
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Erno Mononen <address-removed ([email]address-removed[/email])> wrote:
| Quote: | Hi Chris,
Chris Nelson wrote:
| Quote: | I downloaded the latest nightly build of NB ruby support so I could run focused tests in shoulda. Unfortunately, whatever happens during the building of the ruby navigator outline view is so much slower that it makes NB unusable. My classes are pretty large but 6.5 is able to handle them much better. Any ideas why this would be?
|
I think it's a side effect of the type inference improvements done in 7.0 dev. That stuff is still pretty fresh and hasn't yet been optimized (nor thoroughly tested). I'll dig into this area in the coming weeks and will look at this particular issue too. For the FCS we'll want performance to be at least on par with 6.5.
Cheers,
Erno
([email]address-removed[/email])
([email]address-removed[/email])
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Erno Mononen
Posted via mailing list.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:50 pm Post subject: Latest builds melt my CPU when trying to display navigator |
|
|
Chris Nelson wrote:
| Quote: | Makes sense. FWIW, it appears to do a whole a lot of work to build
the navigation when you switch back to a class you've already visited,
so it seems like there's at least some opportunity to do some caching.
|
Agreed, seems that caching should help here. I haven't yet looked at the
code behind the navigator view in details, but from what I've gathered I
think there are places where further optimizing can be done.
Erno
| Quote: |
--Chris
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Erno Mononen <address-removed
<mailto:address-removed>> wrote:
Hi Chris,
Chris Nelson wrote:
I downloaded the latest nightly build of NB ruby support so I
could run focused tests in shoulda. Unfortunately, whatever
happens during the building of the ruby navigator outline view
is so much slower that it makes NB unusable. My classes are
pretty large but 6.5 is able to handle them much better. Any
ideas why this would be?
I think it's a side effect of the type inference improvements done
in 7.0 dev. That stuff is still pretty fresh and hasn't yet been
optimized (nor thoroughly tested). I'll dig into this area in the
coming weeks and will look at this particular issue too. For the
FCS we'll want performance to be at least on par with 6.5.
Cheers,
Erno
<mailto:address-removed>
<mailto:address-removed>
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
