NetBeans Forums
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gregg Wonderly Posted via mailing list.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 2:47 pm Post subject: Ant vs Maven vs Eclipse, IntelliJ, NetBeans – Exploring Incremental Buil ds |
|
|
For the record, calling netbeans a "build tool" is nuts. Ant vs Maven is the
question, netbeans can be used to develop projects that build with either of
those build tools.
Gregg Wonderly
Melongo Annabel wrote:
| Quote: | I just filled out the form and I gave NB a boost!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Fabrizio Giudici <address-removed>
*To:* address-removed
*Sent:* Thursday, October 1, 2009 11:26:34 AM
*Subject:* Re: [nbusers] Ant vs Maven vs Eclipse, IntelliJ, NetBeans –
Exploring Incremental Builds
David Booth wrote:
| Quote: |
We’re looking into incremental builds — trying to document the
differences in popularity & productivity between using tools like Ant
and Maven versus IDEs. We haven’t seen a study like this before, and
we’ve already received responses from over 550 developers - but only
20 have said they use NetBeans. We feel this number is low, and we’d
like this report to be as accurate as responsible, so if you can take
2 mins to answer the 3 multiple-choice questions in this Google Form,
we’d really appreciate it.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHlRT1dCb2xnUldpUzRUZ3hNNlBOdkE6MA..
Thanks,
Dave
| Hmm... I suppose the first question should be better explained:
What build tool do you use for incremental builds on your largest
current project?
# Ant
# Maven
# Eclipse
# Netbeans
# IntelliJ IDEA
if I use NetBeans, I'm either using Ant or Maven behind the scenes -
from 6.7 we have the incremental compiler such as in Eclipse.. But I
don't know how many people realize this is an incremental build, and
this could explain why you have just a few NetBeans answers. I bet most
of people using NetBeans will answer "Ant" in that case (in contrast to
Eclipse users, that have enjoyed this feature for many years now). Your
definition is ok, but I'd probably include a further sentence to explain
that the NetBeans / Eclipse background compiler is a good candidate. I
don't know whether it makes sense to change the definition in the middle
of the poll, though.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici <http://weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici> - www.tidalwave.it/blog
address-removed - mobile: +39 348.150.6941
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|